Are you sure CoPilot violates LGPL?

I mean if author is not happy with this type of use, it may be better to have an explicit clause in the license. For example declaring ML models trained on the licensed code base as derived work, that must be made available to others for free, under the same license.

(in addition to migration of the repository)

13.03.2023, 22:13, "Daniel Kochmański" <daniel@turtleware.eu>:

Dear All,

I've wanted to do it after the upcoming release but it's months already and it doesn't seem to be much closer than before.

Due to GitHub/Microsoft taking our work without proper attribution and not respecting the license (with CoPilot)
we're moving the repository to a non-profit hosting Codeberg. The new home of the repository is:

https://codeberg.org/McCLIM/McCLIM

The repository on GitHub is archived and available so we won't break existing urls.

During the discussion on our IRC channel some questions emerged:

- why not gitlab.common-lisp.net?

  According to some users it is not very reliable - 2fa, repository
  limit per user, servers are down from time to time.

- what good will that do? people will mirror on github anyway.

  It is a very sad state of affairs that we can't stand up against
  techno-bullies who take from us :| but not doing anything would
  be even worse because that would be a silent consent.

(with-jokes (:ignorable t)

- it learns like human so it is not a violation!

  yada yada yada :)

- but but what about the stars?

  I'm afraid that our inflated ego may not survive this.

)

With this humorous accent I wish you all the best and I hope to see you during upcoming ELS in Amsterdam. :)

Best regards,
Daniel

--
Daniel Kochmański ;; aka jackdaniel | Przemyśl, Poland
TurtleWare - Daniel Kochmański | www.turtleware.eu

"Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi