Thanks Christophe
That CLIM needs some human power and is not deeply flawed is good news to me. I can work on it and use it knowing that my work is not completely meaningless from the start.
Cheers,
Mariano
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Christophe Rhodes csr21@cantab.net wrote:
Mariano Montone marianomontone@gmail.com writes:
So I was wondering why CLIM is dead. It looks like it doesn't have any activity at all. And I think it is a pity, because when I first looked at Listener/Climacs/Debugger/Inspector stuff, I thought it would be a very nice replacement for SLIME, for instance. I'm SLIME user, but I think there's lot of room for improvements in the Lisp tools area, and the CLIM tools + usability improvements + possibilities to extend the tools very easily sounds very good to me.
Well, one argument is that things don't start out equal. Yes, the Listener, Climacs, Debugger and Inspector are pretty good, but they have to compete with other tools out there, not only for functionality but also for maintenance time. Put bluntly, CLIM is sleeping (maybe not dead, because interesting ideas never die :) because there was a lack of person power to keep it awake. I agree that there's a lot of potential in the tools, but there's a lot of potential in all sorts of things and only a limited amount of time to spend developing that potential.
Does anyone know why CLIM is not used anymore? Does it have any very bad design decisions? I'm not really sure about output recording/redisplay,
etc
(I haven't seen theme elsewhere, as if that could be automatically
handled
in general). Don't know about composability and layout yet (I'm still struggling a bit with that now). And I also see some bugs, like some refreshing problems when scrolling, but bugs should be fixable.
It's not got terrible design decisions: there are a couple of problems in some layers of the stack, but nothing that couldn't be worked around. Output recording and incremental redisplay are brave ideas, output recording somewhat more salvageable than incremental redisplay, but they don't cost too much if you don't use them. I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with CLIM, or fundamentally better in other toolkits: it's just that the pool of talent and energy to perform the pretty thankless task of making it all work to the extent of its potential seems currently unavailable.
What would it take? Money, or graduate students, I think.
Cheers,
Christophe