Re: [mcclim-devel] Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?

Christophe Rhodes csr21@cam.ac.uk writes:

Be that as it may, rather than speculating further I would suggest to Paolo that he try with the mcclim sources of "a few weeks ago" in the same lisp and compares the results. If there is a difference, then

I have checked out a fresh copy of McCLIM's CVS sources with:

cvs co -D 2006-03-25 mcclim

The test:

(time (clim-listener::com-show-class-subclasses t))

takes about 0.92 s on the same system, i.e. a 2.8 GHz Pentium IV machine running Slackware Linux 10.0 and CMUCL Snapshot 2006-02 (19C).

Compilation with CMUCL remained broken for about a month before late March 2006.

Paolo