Re: [mcclim-devel] trac? (other plans?)

Christophe Rhodes <csr21@cam.ac.uk> writes:

Common-lisp.net relatively newly supports trac. Should we take advantage of it for a bug tracker? I suppose we should listen to Paolo in particular, who has heroically been wrestling with his bug list on McCLiki -- Paolo, do you think trac would make that part of it easier?

I inadvertently sent my reply only to Christophe: any bug tracking tool the McCLIM developers decide to use is fine with me. Paolo -- Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log