Re: [mcclim-devel] question about CLIM spec
Wasn't the plan to move the annotated spec to common-lisp.net? Or did I miss an update on that? CY --- "Robert P. Goldman" <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
"RS" == Robert Strandh <strandh@labri.fr> writes:
RS> rpgoldman@real-time.com writes: >> >> Question: have I misread the specification, or is this a deficiency >> in it?
RS> The latter is very likely. You can do us a favor and go to the RS> annotatable spec at
RS> http://bauhh.dyndns.org:8000/clim-spec/index.html
RS> and enter your comments at the appropriate place.
OK, I had a preliminary whack at it. I hope the comments are useful. I am hardly an expert on this subject!
R _______________________________________________ mcclim-devel mailing list mcclim-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel
Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
C Y writes:
Wasn't the plan to move the annotated spec to common-lisp.net? Or did I miss an update on that?
I discussed that with Gilbert a few days ago, and now it seems that he prefers keeping it on his home machine. -- Robert Strandh --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming: any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
C Y -
Robert Strandh