9 Jan
2014
9 Jan
'14
2:08 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Massimiliano Ghilardi massimiliano.ghilardi@gmail.com wrote:
- Thinking that (or actually defining) MAP_FAILED = -1 is misleading. MAP_FAILED is (void *)-1.
Your patch looks good. Perhaps we could teach cffi-grovel how to grovel pointers, then we'd be able to ditch the *map-failed-pointer* bits. I've attached an untested patch that does that. Does using (constant ... :type pointer) for the MAP_* constants solve the problem you found?
Cheers,
--
Luís Oliveira
http://kerno.org/~luis/