Well, I ran across the discrepancy precisely because I was using the behavior. However, it isn't that important in the present case, and nobody else has mentioned it, so I agree that it isn't worth a major effort to fix.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com> wrote:
Fixing this with the current implementation would require
whole-program analysis. This is one of those things where I am
inclined not to fix it - I only ever used this behavior once, that I
remember.

Vladimir

2010/2/22 Daniel Gackle <danielgackle@gmail.com>:
> Looks like our implementation doesn't match CL's after all.
>
> (blah2-call) evaluates to (2 5) in Common Lisp, but [2, undefined] in
> Parenscript.
>
> (defun blah1 ()
>   (values 2 5))
>
> (defun blah2 ()
>   (blah1))
>
> (defun blah2-call ()
>   (multiple-value-bind (a b) (blah2) (list a b)))
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
parenscript-devel mailing list
parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel