On the other hand, the HTML generation really isn't core to Parenscript (a few people have complained about it in the past), but it does come in very useful. I don't think it's worth it to put it into a separate project (there are much better tools like CL-WHO and LML2 if you just want to generate HTML from Lisp). What I will probably do is as you suggest and export that interface for those who want to use the Parenscript HTML generation facility throughout for something light-weight. If JavaScript came with streams built-in, what I would probably do is make a wrapper for CL-WHO output.
Cool.
Speaking of CL-WHO, would anyone object if I changed the syntax of the Parenscript HTML markup to be like that of CL-WHO?
That seems like a good idea. -- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM