Re: [parenscript-devel] A class of bugs in PS: expressions not parenthesized when necessary

Travis Cross wrote:

...

and here again:

(ps (- (if x y z))) => "-x ? y : z;"

This now returns:

=> -(x ? y : z);

I pushed a minor overhaul of operator handling. The old code was badly broken, particularly with regard to unary operators and named operators.

Some things that now work correctly:

(ps (new (or a b))) (ps (delete (if a (or b c) d))) (ps (! (if (or x (! y)) z))) (ps (- (- (* 1 2) 3))) (ps (instanceof (or a b) (if x y z))) (ps (doeach (x (or a b))))

Any error of expression precedence in PS output is a bug. Please let us know if there are any unsolved cases that you can find.

Thanks,

-- Travis