Good catch! I should have written:

(ps (let ((abc (@ x abc)))
              (funcall abc)))

=> 

"var abc901 = x.abc;
abc();"

I gave the wrong version because we have a customized @ that plays games with symbols and keywords. But the above runs in pure PS and is still a bug, I would think.

Daniel


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Michael Compton <michael.compton@littleedge.co.uk> wrote:
When I run that through I get:

(ps (let ((abc (@ x :abc)))
                     (funcall abc)))

=>

"var abc = x['abc'];
abc();"

Are you maybe using an earlier version of PS?

Michael

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:04 -0600, Daniel Gackle wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
>
> I don't think we heard back about this bug. I've got an ugly
> workaround for it in my code, which it would be nice to get out of
> there. Do you think it will be hard to fix?
>
>
> Daniel
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Gackle
> <danielgackle@gmail.com> wrote:
>         Just ran across this one:
>
>
>         (ps (let ((abc (@ x :abc)))
>                       (funcall abc)))
>
>
>         =>
>
>
>         "var abc901 = x.abc;
>         abc();"
>
>
>         Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel



_______________________________________________
parenscript-devel mailing list
parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel