The error given depends on your Lisp implementation. SBCL gives me: The variable X is unbound. [Condition of type UNBOUND-VARIABLE]
However, this does highlight a very interesting point I didn't realize before: ParenScript macroexpansion does take place in the Lisp environment, so there could be unintended "leaks" between the two this way. For example:
(defvar *foo* 123)
(ps (macrolet ((blah () *foo*)) (blah)))
=> "123; "
Which may or may not be what you want.
Vladimir
On 9/13/07, Daniel Gackle danielgackle@gmail.com wrote:
When a macroexpansion tries to evaluate an unbound variable, as in the following,
(ps (macrolet ((blah () x)) (blah)))
the resulting error message is unhelpful: "Attempt to take the car of "Unbound Value" which is not listp."
Could it say "Attempt to take the value of the unbound variable X" instead?
Daniel
parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel