Will they still merge ok? >

I believe that when you format patches this way, git will apply them
as long as the surrounding context matches what is in the patch. (If
I'm wrong about this, somebody please correct me!)

Daniel

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:58 AM, szergling <senatorzergling@gmail.com> wrote:
I have also encountered this problem. Enclosed is a patch,
with an additional fix to a similar issues inside arefs/arrays.

I hope the patches are acceptable (don't know git well
enough). I would prefer for them to not depend on my
other patches from a few days ago. Will they still merge
ok?

Yong.


On 5/4/10, Daniel Gackle <danielgackle@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another syntax error in the new PS. This form:
>
> (let ((blah (let ((x (foo)))
>               (if (null x) y z)))))
>
> ... compiles to...
>
> var blah = x = foo(), x == null ? y : z;
>
> ... which is incorrect. Previously, PS produced this, which is correct:
>
> var blah = (x = foo(), x == null ? y : z);
>
> Daniel
>

_______________________________________________
parenscript-devel mailing list
parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel