Re: [parenscript-devel] Side effects between lexical scopes of two closures

To me separate bindings is expected. I suggest using gensym to compile the binding var names.

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Gackle danielgackle@gmail.com wrote:

In the following, (FOO) should evaluate to 50, but actually evaluates to 90 because BAR's A binding has overwritten FOO's. Should they not have separate bindings?

(progn (let ((a 5)) (defun foo () (* 10 a))) (let ((a 9)) (defun bar () (* 100 a))))

var a = 5; function foo() { return 10 * a; }; var a = 9; function bar() { return 100 * a; };

Daniel

---

parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel