![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6a2a0564e2c584c8e9fa1ec369bd23e0.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I'm assuming λ is a macro that expands into a lambda that does (RETURN <something>). Indeed I've changed RETURN to try to work like it does in CL. If there's no nil block it will still work, but issue a warning to encourage people to change their code. An easy way to get around this warning in your case is to make λ wrap its body in a (block nil ...). Vladimir 2010/12/6 Daniel Gackle <danielgackle@gmail.com>:
(1) The following expression generates the correct code: (defun blah () (λ () (foo 123))) But it also emits "Warning: Returning from unknown block NILBLOCK", which is undeserved. (2) It's not clear how to do explicit return from a lambda now. That is, (defun blah () (λ () (when (foo) (return 123)) ;; do some other stuff )) generates the same warning as above. Is this just a bug, or is it suggesting that one must explicitly declare a scope using (BLOCK NIL...) in order to do an explicit return warning-free? I'm hoping not the latter.
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel