23 Feb
2010
23 Feb
'10
5:40 a.m.
Fixing this with the current implementation would require whole-program analysis. This is one of those things where I am inclined not to fix it - I only ever used this behavior once, that I remember. Vladimir 2010/2/22 Daniel Gackle <danielgackle@gmail.com>:
Looks like our implementation doesn't match CL's after all.
(blah2-call) evaluates to (2 5) in Common Lisp, but [2, undefined] in Parenscript.
(defun blah1 () (values 2 5))
(defun blah2 () (blah1))
(defun blah2-call () (multiple-value-bind (a b) (blah2) (list a b)))
Daniel
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel