Re: [parenscript-devel] what's wrong?

< Well there's no reason not to wrap it in a lambda >

Do you mean that PS can detect when the LOOP form is being used as an expression and turn it into one with a lambda? That would be great.

I hope you don't mean lambdifying all ordinary vanilla loops, though. That would be not great :)

Dan

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Vladimir Sedach vsedach@gmail.com wrote:

Well there's no reason not to wrap it in a lambda, so I'm going to classify this as a bug.

...

Is there something that can help to convert js code to parenscript code?

Red Daly has https://github.com/gonzojive/js-to-parenscript

Vladimir

---

parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel