The version we're using (4cc463) does this: (ps (define-symbol-macro blah 10) (fn blah)) => "fn(10);" The latest version (2471a2) does this: (ps (define-symbol-macro blah 10) (fn blah)) => "fn(blah);" On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com> wrote:
I've added all the buggy code examples you've sent so far to the Parenscript test suite, which passes. Send an example of this bug, I think it may be a different issue.
Vladimir
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Gackle <danielgackle@gmail.com> wrote:
I just ran our regression tests and am noticing one problem: some symbol macros aren't expanding. This seems like it might be the return of a bug I posted about before. I don't have time to post an example at the moment (I can do so later), but thought I should report the issue.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everybody,
I just pushed a bunch of patches greatly improving Parenscript compilation performance, and adding the ability to print Parenscript output directly to a stream. I think it's time to make a release. Please check out the latest version from the git repository and see if everything works as expected. If there aren't any bug reports by Sept. 18, I am going to make a new release.
Thank you, Vladimir
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel