The version we're using (4cc463) does this:
(ps (define-symbol-macro blah 10)
(fn blah))
=> "fn(10);"
The latest version (2471a2) does this:
(ps (define-symbol-macro blah 10)
(fn blah))
=> "fn(blah);"
I've added all the buggy code examples you've sent so far to the
Parenscript test suite, which passes. Send an example of this bug, I
think it may be a different issue.
Vladimir
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Gackle <danielgackle@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just ran our regression tests and am noticing one problem: some symbol
> macros aren't expanding. This seems like it might be the return of a bug I
> posted about before. I don't have time to post an example at the moment (I
> can do so later), but thought I should report the issue.
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I just pushed a bunch of patches greatly improving Parenscript
>> compilation performance, and adding the ability to print Parenscript
>> output directly to a stream. I think it's time to make a release.
>> Please check out the latest version from the git repository and see if
>> everything works as expected. If there aren't any bug reports by Sept.
>> 18, I am going to make a new release.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> parenscript-devel mailing list
>> parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
parenscript-devel mailing list
parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel