Hi, since this came up I attached a one line patch for PS-INLINE, which in the current form won't run, because COMPILE-EXPRESSION? is unbound.
Cheers, Olof
Hi Olof,
Thank you for the patch, this is indeed a real bug. The strange thing is PS-INLINE worked fine in SBCL. I guess I really need to start testing in other Common Lisp implementations.
Vladimir
2010/6/21 Olof-Joachim Frahm Olof.Frahm@web.de:
Hi, since this came up I attached a one line patch for PS-INLINE, which in the current form won't run, because COMPILE-EXPRESSION? is unbound.
Cheers, Olof
-- The world is burning. Run.
parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
Vladimir Sedach vsedach@gmail.com writes:
Thank you for the patch, this is indeed a real bug. The strange thing is PS-INLINE worked fine in SBCL. I guess I really need to start testing in other Common Lisp implementations.
Well it didn't work for me in SBCL (1.0.38.6), so maybe the variable was already bound from testing or so :)
That's the weird thing - the variable was unbound at top level, and running PS-INLINE from the toplevel (REPL) worked fine.
Vladimir
2010/6/22 Olof-Joachim Frahm Olof.Frahm@web.de:
Vladimir Sedach vsedach@gmail.com writes:
Thank you for the patch, this is indeed a real bug. The strange thing is PS-INLINE worked fine in SBCL. I guess I really need to start testing in other Common Lisp implementations.
Well it didn't work for me in SBCL (1.0.38.6), so maybe the variable was already bound from testing or so :)
-- The world is burning. Run.
parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net