(defpsmacro blah () 123) => NIL (ps (blah)) => "123;"
but:
(ps::macroexpand-1 '(blah)) => (BLAH)
Wouldn't one expect this to provide the macroexpansion? I can't find anything in Parenscript now corresponding to expand-form or whatever it used to be called.
Daniel
p.s. I wrote "123;" above for neatness, but PS actually emits "123;\n". Seems the newline should only be there when more than one line of JS is generated. It's a minor point, but noticeable when working from the REPL.
On 9/12/07, Daniel Gackle danielgackle@gmail.com wrote:
(defpsmacro blah () 123) => NIL (ps (blah)) => "123;"
but:
(ps::macroexpand-1 '(blah)) => (BLAH)
Wouldn't one expect this to provide the macroexpansion? I can't find anything in Parenscript now corresponding to expand-form or whatever it used to be called.
ParenScript doesn't shadow macroexpand or macroexpand-1. What you're looking for is ps::ps-macroexpand (I didn't make a -1 version or export it).
Daniel
p.s. I wrote "123;" above for neatness, but PS actually emits "123;\n". Seems the newline should only be there when more than one line of JS is generated. It's a minor point, but noticeable when working from the REPL.
It is annoying. Hopefully when I rewrite the printer using more format and less loop that will go away without me having to do any extra work.
Vladimir
Great, thanks.
On 9/12/07, Vladimir Sedach vsedach@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/12/07, Daniel Gackle danielgackle@gmail.com wrote:
(defpsmacro blah () 123) => NIL (ps (blah)) => "123;"
but:
(ps::macroexpand-1 '(blah)) => (BLAH)
Wouldn't one expect this to provide the macroexpansion? I can't find anything in Parenscript now corresponding to expand-form or whatever it
used
to be called.
ParenScript doesn't shadow macroexpand or macroexpand-1. What you're looking for is ps::ps-macroexpand (I didn't make a -1 version or export it).
Daniel
p.s. I wrote "123;" above for neatness, but PS actually emits "123;\n". Seems the newline should only be there when more than one line of JS is generated. It's a minor point, but noticeable when working from the
REPL.
It is annoying. Hopefully when I rewrite the printer using more format and less loop that will go away without me having to do any extra work.
Vladimir _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net
-
Daniel Gackle -
Vladimir Sedach