![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f6a35c85d26694e26bb92ea4d4262c77.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
9 Mar
2010
9 Mar
'10
10:14 a.m.
Hello Peter, It seems that transaction was a misguided attempt (apparently I believed postgres supported nested transactions at the time) to prevent the failure to insert from abandoning the transaction. I think the cleanest solution at this point is to add a variant, save-dao/transaction, that uses a savepoint, and declare the regular save-dao to only be safe outside of transactions. I've pushed this change to the repository. Best, Marijn