Thank you--it's helpful to hear that.
-Eli
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Marijn Haverbeke marijnh@gmail.com wrote:
Definitely use local-time. The integration worked well, back in 2007, and neither library has changed very much since then, so I think you can feel safe that they are in good shape (others are using them as well).
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Eli Naeher enaeher@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on moving an existing application to Postmodern, and I'm
trying
to decide whether to go with simple-date or local-time. Currently all
dates
are stored as "timestamp without time zone," but we are hoping to move toward a timezone-aware model at some point down the road (although not immediately--it might end up being a couple years).
For this reason I'm considering using local-time instead of simple-date. Times and dates are a big part of the application so I'd like to get this right. I notice that the local-time cl-postgres integration has not had
any
commits in a few years. I'm hoping this is because it is stable and complete. Is anyone using it?
Thank you, -Eli