Thank you--it's helpful to hear that. -Eli On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Marijn Haverbeke <marijnh@gmail.com> wrote:
Definitely use local-time. The integration worked well, back in 2007, and neither library has changed very much since then, so I think you can feel safe that they are in good shape (others are using them as well).
Hello,
I'm working on moving an existing application to Postmodern, and I'm
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Eli Naeher <enaeher@gmail.com> wrote: trying
to decide whether to go with simple-date or local-time. Currently all dates are stored as "timestamp without time zone," but we are hoping to move toward a timezone-aware model at some point down the road (although not immediately--it might end up being a couple years).
For this reason I'm considering using local-time instead of simple-date. Times and dates are a big part of the application so I'd like to get this right. I notice that the local-time cl-postgres integration has not had any commits in a few years. I'm hoping this is because it is stable and complete. Is anyone using it?
Thank you, -Eli