13 Aug
2011
13 Aug
'11
2:34 p.m.
Marijn Haverbeke marijnh@gmail.com writes:
I don't understand how is simple-date supposed to be loaded now. Just loading postmodern doesn't seem to be sufficient anymore. Should it be loaded explicitly?
Yes. (And it has been like this for a long time.)
It was intended like this? Because before dfb9da112410ccc60d92d7bc8ce0c1efb41b6e9e loading postmodern loaded simple-date too. Anyway, I'm happy with either way, as long as it's deterministic.
--
With best regards, Stas.