I was wondering if it was a bug or intended behavior that row reader functions do not properly return multiple values?

I am working on a cl-postgres backend to clsql, so I am not very familiar with much of the workings of this project, but noticed this somewhat odd (from my perspective) behavior. I have worked around this in the obvious way (list instead of multiple values).

It seems to be a problem with the returning-effected-rows macro (which expands to a let, effectively discarding any multiple values returned from the row reader). Is there a reason not to change the definition to the following?

http://paste.lisp.org/display/88358

Cheers, Russ Tyndall