I posted this to Stack Overflow but was hoping for more input.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51638864/common-lisp-style-multiple-pac…
May I get recommendations or links to representative code repositories
with good style for multiple related Common Lisp packages, please?
For instance, consider a high-level workflow library with accompanying
lower-level API, each in its own CL package but same git repo due to
synchronized releases.
Each system (|*.asd| file) isolates tests and may be invoked using:
|(asdf:test-system foo :force t)|
Separate systems may be built via |make|, which definitely helps isolate
SBCL code-coverage reports.
Some users of the library may only want to load the lower-level API. For
simplifying dependencies for those using higher-level API, it seems best
to keep everything bundled in one repo. Any revision to one library
would likely require updating all for the same release.
I currently have a single directory tree with a subdirectory for each CL
package. There's a top-level |Makefile| plus one in each subdirectory
that the library maintain would use. The top-level also contains
symbolic links for |.asd| files pointing into relevant subdirectories.
(It's a library deeply dependent upon POSIX calls via |uiop-posix|, so
it's only applicable on an OS with sym-links.)
This seems to be an issue at large considering issue #1 for
Quicklisp-docs [0].
Found nothing relevant in Google's CL style guide [1], State of the
Common Lisp Ecosystem, 2015 [2], Edi's CL Recipes [3] or Lisp-lang [4].
Browsing repos seem to have quite a mix of styles.
* [0] https://github.com/rudolfochrist/quicklisp-docs/issues/1
* [1] https://google.github.io/styleguide/lispguide.xml
* [2]
https://web.archive.org/web/20160305061250/http://eudoxia.me/article/common…
* [3] http://weitz.de/cl-recipes/
* [4] http://lisp-lang.org/learn/writing-libraries but see also their
section on Continuous Integration
Repo to be fixed: https://gitlab.com/dpezely/cl-mmap
(commit a23bd88d of 2018-07-14; release will be tagged when fixed)
Thanks,
-Daniel
After the last Emacs upgrade to 26.1, the M-s key bind from paredit-mode is replaced by `Next element matching (regexp)` command in the slime repl buffer. Sorry for the silly question, but how to get M-s mapped to paredit-splice-sexp again? In a lisp file buffer it is working as expected.
Best,
--
Alexandre Rademaker
http://arademaker.github.io
