1 Dec
2011
1 Dec
'11
10:12 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll@googlemail.com> wrote:
I _now_ think that the compiler macro processor should simply recognize the failure to parse the form and return the original form, unprocessed
I agree. Otherwise the compiler macro writer has to use &rest and parse the argument list themselves; what's the point of making them do that? -- Scott