Well, I thought, after delving deeper into the code, that it might be some kind of sophisticated programmer humor, making a comment about the vast amount of CPU cycles devoted to nonsensical computing or some such…
- DM
On Dec 18, 2017, at 15:54, Pascal Bourguignon pjb@informatimago.com wrote:
On 18 Dec 2017, at 23:31, David McClain <dbm@refined-audiometrics.com mailto:dbm@refined-audiometrics.com> wrote:
umm… was this supposed to be some kind of joke? I’ll bite... I don’t get it. I was actually hoping to learn something here...
But the code does look rather peculiar on close inspection. Why the use of macros for pushing new transaction blocks? And the conversions to octet vectors may work for strings, but not in general for arbitrary integer or float values…
If it is supposed to be a joke, I’ll chuckle and just chuck the code…
I guess not: https://dev.to/damcosset/trying-to-understand-blockchain-by-making-one-ce4 https://dev.to/damcosset/trying-to-understand-blockchain-by-making-one-ce4 It’s like, everybody will be busy implementing blockchains. It’s the new fizz-buzz…
-- __Pascal J. Bourguignon__