On Oct 9, 2012, at 07:52 , Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
IMO, you will have to see what's done by each implementation, and use implementation specific, perhaps even internal functions to get that information.
This would be a good subject for a CDR, to provide a public introspective API.
I second that. A "side" CDR would be to specify other "function specifiers" beside (SETF FOO).
Cheers -- MA
-- __Pascal Bourguignon__
On 08/10/2012, at 15:28, Didier Verna didier@lrde.epita.fr wrote:
Hello,
I cannot find a standard way to figure out whether a setf expander has been defined for a symbol FOO (via either DEFSETF or DEFINE-SETF-EXPANDER).
Is there one? Otherwise, I would also be happy with an SBCL-only solution.
Thank you !
-- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
-- Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01 DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://bimib.disco.unimib.it Viale Sarca 336 I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY
Please note that I am not checking my Spam-box anymore. Please do not forward this email without asking me first.