The late Dan Weinreb's mileage was a lot different, mind you: http://xach.livejournal.com/278815.html
I just go completely the other way, preferring mx-what-ever to mx:what-ever by a mile.
-kt
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Michael J. Forster mike@sharedlogic.ca wrote:
On 29 December 2015 at 19:25, Pascal Costanza pc@p-cos.net wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Also, I agree with Kenny that splitting libraries into too fine-grained small little packages is
not
a good recipe for organizing your projects. Lisp packages want to be big, and there is no major disadvantage in doing so, and I fear that
hierarchical
package names encourage unnecessary fine-grained splitting. That just creates visibility problems, and distract from solving /actual/ problems.
[...]
On a related note, I attempted to retrofit a 150K+ LOC application with "inferred packages"[1] and, revision time and effort aside, I think the only dependency problem it solved was the one it created. I have not tried it with a larger or smaller application, and, of course, YMMV.
Mike
[1] http://davazp.net/2014/11/26/modern-library-with-asdf-and-package-inferred-s...