Re: before and after methods

Dnia 2017-05-17, śro o godzinie 15:24 -0400, Sam Steingold pisze:

...

• Didier Verna qvqvre@yeqr.rcvgn.se [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:

Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do not support before and after methods?

If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom and flexibility than mere before and after. Basically, you can do it yourself.

But Didier is asking about BUILT-IN method combinations. Possibly it was hard to define reasonable agreed semantics for before an after methods in the case of something like AND or APPEND (technical troubles aside).

Regards

ZJ