![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/969f6d9ed5246fede4d86a4be37fafcf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
8 May
2012
8 May
'12
2:47 p.m.
In my view, #; would be handy: #+(or) trips me up visually and is an idiom. I would rather remember that #; is a nulled/commented out form (like ; is for lines), and reserve #+(or) for connoting other things. I would not be horrified if it did not get implemented, but I think I would be prone to use it. I don't remember seeing a reference implementation link. I would like to experiment with using one if it exists. Regards, Paul Nathan