8 May
2012
8 May
'12
6:02 p.m.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Faré fahree@gmail.com wrote:
Is the point to evolve the Common Lisp standard into some kind of CLtL4,
Huh? Did I miss a CLtL3...?
On topic: the proposed syntactic addition is nice, but imho too trivial and too easily provided as a library to bother with a CDR (that would need to be included in each implementation).
Alessio
--
Some gratuitous spam:
http://ripple-project.org Ripple, social credit system
http://villages.cc Villages.cc, Ripple-powered community economy
http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear ABCL, Common Lisp on the JVM
http://code.google.com/p/tapulli my current open source projects
http://www.manydesigns.com/ ManyDesigns Portofino, open source
model-driven Java web application framework