Re: [pro] Heartbleed?

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:13:35 +0200, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:

a dead process sending fixed or previsible packets

I didn't think of that. So basically you ensure the responding connection isn't compromised by exercising the encryption, which is the hardest to fake for a malicious attacker. Makes sense... Shame on me! :)

What about a fixed length input though (and maybe answering with a digest)? It still seems to me that the specified behavior is overly arbitrary/error prone.