Re: before and after methods

Ah, but the OP specified "built-in" along with "non-standard".

hth

-hk

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Sam Steingold sds@gnu.org wrote:

...

• Didier Verna qvqvre@yeqr.rcvgn.se [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:

Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do not support before and after methods?

If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom and flexibility than mere before and after. Basically, you can do it yourself.

-- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504 http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net https://ffii.org http://camera.org http://think-israel.org http://no2bds.org Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH sides.