Re: [pro] macros expanding to defclass + some mop code

On 12/30/10 2:12 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:

The solution I proposed last avoids that by having exactly one class definition. However, such cases are unlikely to occur in practice, so this is likely just an academic exercise. Nevertheless, I think it's important to mention this

I agree that mentioning this is a good idea. Part of the whole idea of the "pro" mailing list is to be a place where we can all share knowledge about the more complex/subtle issues in Common Lisp. Thanks for clearing this up!

-- Dan