Hi,
I have moved the hosting of the Closer projects (MOP Feature Tests, Closer to MOP, ContextL, Filtered Functions, AspectL, LW Compat) to sourceforge. I also switched from darcs hosting to git hosting.
You can find the software now at http://sourceforge.net/p/closer/_list/git
All libraries have received new version numbers based on semantic versioning.
The mailing lists will from now on also be hosted at sourceforge. Please subscribe to the mailing lists at http://sourceforge.net/p/closer/mailman/ if you are interested.
The information on the Closer webpage at http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ has also been updated accordingly.
Please let me know if you have any questions or problems.
Pascal
-- Pascal Costanza The views expressed in this email are my own, and not those of my employer.
Pascal,
there are nice repo conversion tools that retain repo history.
if losing the history was not deliberate, then let me know and i can help with the darcs->git conversion.
08.11.2013, 07:15, "Attila Lendvai" attila.lendvai@gmail.com:
Pascal,
there are nice repo conversion tools that retain repo history.
if losing the history was not deliberate, then let me know and i can help with the darcs->git conversion.
Attila, is this tool public? I am interested in such a tool.
Best regards, - Anton
Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
08.11.2013, 07:15, "Attila Lendvai" attila.lendvai@gmail.com:
Pascal,
there are nice repo conversion tools that retain repo history.
if losing the history was not deliberate, then let me know and i can help with the darcs->git conversion.
Attila, is this tool public? I am interested in such a tool.
https://github.com/purcell/darcs-to-git
Attila, is this tool public? I am interested in such a tool.
yep, this one first, and there's a second option if there are any issues with it:
http://darcs.net/DarcsBridgeUsage
Attila,
Thanks a lot for the offer.
Do you think that keeping the history is important?
Off the top of my hat, I cannot come up with any reasons why it might be…
Pascal
On 8 Nov 2013, at 04:12, Attila Lendvai attila.lendvai@gmail.com wrote:
Pascal,
there are nice repo conversion tools that retain repo history.
if losing the history was not deliberate, then let me know and i can help with the darcs->git conversion.
-- • attila lendvai • PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 -- “The superior man understands what is right; the inferior man understands what will sell.” — Confucius (551–479 BC)
-- Pascal Costanza
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Pascal Costanza pc@p-cos.net wrote:
Do you think that keeping the history is important?
Off the top of my hat, I cannot come up with any reasons why it might be…
Oh. Particularly when commit messages are good, history is quite important. It can answer questions like "who did this?" (so you can bug the right person with your questions), or "how did this work before?" (e.g. if a regression was introduced, you can recover the previous behaviour and study its code, not to mention that you can find regressions more or less automatically with things like git bisect) and many others.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Luís Oliveira luismbo@gmail.com wrote:
Oh. Particularly when commit messages are good, history is quite important. It can answer questions like "who did this?" (so you can
there's little i can add to that. besides maybe aesthetics: why write a nice piece of code, if its history is not fully retained for the historians of the future, or for you when you will tell the war stories to your curious grandchildren from the stone age of CS?
oh, and i must add, that the lisp opensource fairies are especially nice and quick in this thread.
thank you guys! :)
-
Anton Vodonosov -
Attila Lendvai -
Didier Verna -
Luís Oliveira -
Pascal Costanza