Regarding consolidation under LIL just wondering if someone might have suggestions for individual authors of CL data structure libraries on how to work in a way most cooperative with the effort. For example I have a small ctrie lib (http://github.com/danlentz/cl-ctrie) the objective should be to refactor based on what unique interface it could provide, such as "concurrent" or "lock-free"?
Perhaps this question is somewhat specific to LIL but it is a project I've been following with interest
---- Replace the method the carefully chosen name deletes the comment
On Oct 28, 2012, at 3:01 PM, "pro-request@common-lisp.net" pro-request@common-lisp.net wrote:
Send pro mailing list submissions to pro@common-lisp.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to pro-request@common-lisp.net
You can reach the person managing the list at pro-owner@common-lisp.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of pro digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Curating libraries (Far?)
- Re: Curating libraries (A.J. Rossini)
- Re: Curating libraries (Far?)
Message: 1 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:50:18 +0900 From: Far? fahree@gmail.com To: Common Lisp Professionals pro@common-lisp.net Subject: [pro] Curating libraries Message-ID: CAN7nBXfK6R7xB4R_afRdLZ_aR_cyjq14=NVTdVLVEdvWmPPLEQ@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Dear Lisp pro,
I think it is time for us (the Lisp professionals) to do a better job at curating libraries.
Now that, thanks to Quicklisp, people aren't afraid from using libraries anymore, we find that there are too many libraries for any given problem domain, yet that most of these libraries do a bad 80% job max (sometimes 50% or less). Moreover, navigating which of these libraries makes most sense to use is hard.
Ideally, we'd have a one distinguished library providing a 100% solution for any such domain, that we could use and recommend, and that would have an easily recognized name.
For instance, regarding pattern-matching libraries, I'd like to retire fare-matcher, and after migrating any remaining useful functionality (such as fare-quasiquote), recommend that all users should use optima instead. I would similarly push toward the retirement of all other pattern-matching libraries but one. That one library could then be called "pattern-matching" and use the package "pattern-matching".
Similarly, I'm trying to push for a single data structure library. This time, I'm putting forward my own Lisp-Interface-Library (aka LIL) because I think it has much more potential than other libraries, including some with a lot of existing data structures (such as cl-containers): Indeed, LIL can accommodate both pure and stateful data structures, in both Interface-Passing Style (IPS) and traditional Object-Oriented Programming (OOP), with automatic mapping between the four combinations. Moreover, its IPS allows for parametric polymorphism, which wasn't previously available in CL, and is great to bootstrap new data structures.
I'd like to invite you to join me in this effort. Whichever libraries you use or maintain, please partake in this consolidation effort.
??? ? Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau ?Reflection&Cybernethics? http://fare.tunes.org The problem with being a citizen of the world is that you don't get to travelling abroad much.
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:25:48 +0100 From: "A.J. Rossini" blindglobe@gmail.com To: Far? fahree@gmail.com Cc: Common Lisp Professionals pro@common-lisp.net Subject: Re: [pro] Curating libraries Message-ID: CAA1MS4pVM0-ePAPsA1Dx_FH8dTWsxr1zHKk6YSMUhqbuFyFu=A@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Far? fahree@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to invite you to join me in this effort. Whichever libraries you use or maintain, please partake in this consolidation effort.
As discussed, am looking at the data importers ((text)-file or system to CL array, i.e. the prototypical CSV to CL-array importer), and would be happy to work with others who want to take a lead on this topic (I'm aware of 5-6 blog posts over the past few years to review as part of due diligence, and 5+ different systems which range from simple importers to a bit more sophisticated state machine parsers...)
I eventually need something like a unified version of R's foreign package (unified with the other data importer and exporter packages), but of course, need to start somewhere, and somewhere is with CSV, TSV, and similiar delimiter-separated-values (DSV).
best, -tony
blindglobe@gmail.com Muttenz, Switzerland. "Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05).
Drink Coffee: Do stupid things faster with more energy!
Message: 3 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:01:58 +0900 From: Far? fahree@gmail.com To: "A.J. Rossini" blindglobe@gmail.com Cc: Common Lisp Professionals pro@common-lisp.net Subject: Re: [pro] Curating libraries Message-ID: CAN7nBXcSAopSCLcWVeYM=2HQfFczLfuD-LNqBNs_xwyTmPjzDw@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:25 PM, A.J. Rossini blindglobe@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Far? fahree@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to invite you to join me in this effort. Whichever libraries you use or maintain, please partake in this consolidation effort.
As discussed, am looking at the data importers ((text)-file or system to CL array, i.e. the prototypical CSV to CL-array importer), and would be happy to work with others who want to take a lead on this topic (I'm aware of 5-6 blog posts over the past few years to review as part of due diligence, and 5+ different systems which range from simple importers to a bit more sophisticated state machine parsers...)
I eventually need something like a unified version of R's foreign package (unified with the other data importer and exporter packages), but of course, need to start somewhere, and somewhere is with CSV, TSV, and similiar delimiter-separated-values (DSV).
Speaking of CSV, a few years back I reviewed the existing offering and beefed up my fare-csv library which was lagging behind so it was better than all other available CSV libraries (at the time): fare-csv can be configured to be compliant with at least two conflicting CSV standards, and more, and by default follows the more relaxed "Creativyst" specification.
I haven't followed recent developments, but there as in other cases, someone who actually develops or uses these libraries should drive a consolidation.
??? ? Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau ?Reflection&Cybernethics? http://fare.tunes.org You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it for himself. ? attributed to Galileo Galilei
pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
End of pro Digest, Vol 24, Issue 5
-
Dan Lentz