Hello,
does anyone have a global view on the status of this in the main CL implementations (SBCL, CMU-CL, ECL, CCL, CLISP, ABCL, ACL, LispWorks). By that, I mean mostly:
- which implementation can do what, - how do you ask for interpretation, bytecomp or comp.
I find this information quite hard to figure out. Unless I missed it, I think it would be good to have a page somewhere summarizing this.
Thank you !
Hi Didier,
Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient?
(I guess it's not, but it's a good start.)
P!
2012/9/26 Didier Verna didier@lrde.epita.fr:
Hello,
does anyone have a global view on the status of this in the main CL implementations (SBCL, CMU-CL, ECL, CCL, CLISP, ABCL, ACL, LispWorks). By that, I mean mostly:
- which implementation can do what,
- how do you ask for interpretation, bytecomp or comp.
I find this information quite hard to figure out. Unless I missed it, I think it would be good to have a page somewhere summarizing this.
Thank you !
-- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Adrien_Pi=E9rard?= axioplase@gmail.com Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:30 +0900 Cc: Common Lisp pros pro@common-lisp.net
Hi Didier,
Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient?
(I guess it's not, but it's a good start.)
It doesn't mention the commercial lisps (ACL, LW, Scieneer). Dan Weinreb's survey (referenced from the cliki page) is much better.
- n
Nick Levine wrote:
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Adrien_Pi=E9rard?= axioplase@gmail.com Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:30 +0900 Cc: Common Lisp pros pro@common-lisp.net
Hi Didier,
Isn't http://www.cliki.net/Common%20Lisp%20implementation sufficient?
(I guess it's not, but it's a good start.)
It doesn't mention the commercial lisps (ACL, LW, Scieneer). Dan Weinreb's survey (referenced from the cliki page) is much better.
Yes, although a bit too verbose. Neither of them provide details on how to request interpretation / bytecomp or comp for implementations that provide several options. I guess what I'm looking for is more "cookbook" style.
-
Adrien Piérard -
Didier Verna -
Nick Levine