13 Jun
2011
13 Jun
'11
9:19 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:10 PM, mike mike@illsoft.com wrote:
I checked that page but I don't see any mention of the \K option. Am I to assume that its not supported in your library?
Right. Actually, until now I had never heard of the \K switch (or I forgot about it). CL-PPCRE is largely modeled on Perl (at a particular point in time) and when I wrote CL-PPCRE, Perl didn't have \K.
Is there a similar switch?
From a quick look at the PCRE docs I'd say that some of the \K
behavior can probably be emulated using look-behind assertions.