June 2004 - slime-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[slime-devel] splash patch
by Pascal J.Bourguignon 20 Jun '04

20 Jun '04

Since I cannot go pass the Initial Handshake, here is some initial eye sugar: a splash screen for slime. The patch includes in addition for clisp: - specifying the package to unlock when redefining BREAK (COMMON-LISP), - *slime-load-verbose* and swank-loader:*swank-load-verbose* variables to avoid all these Loading/Loaded messages. (The diffs are from the FAIRLY_STABLE release. Just ask if you want them from HEAD). -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein

1 1

[slime-devel] slime/clisp hang: tcpdump
by Pascal J.Bourguignon 20 Jun '04

20 Jun '04

Here is the output of tcpdump -s 0 -i lo -w /tmp/capture.pcap on my slime/clisp hanging. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein

1 2

[slime-devel] Towards 1.0?
by Luke Gorrie 20 Jun '04

20 Jun '04

Howdidlydoo, I'm feeling impulsive lately. How about shooting for a 1.0 release? I know some people are already in favour (hi Brian :-), so I'm particularly probing for the opinion of the other side (hi Helmut :-) >From my end there are a lot of good omens for an August 27 release: It will be the one-year anniversary of the first public mention [1] of SLIME. (Time really flies!) It will be my birthday. (*) I'll be starting a new job, and be really busy for a while. How do the tea leaves look for you guys? Cheers, Luke [1]: The fateful posting of a tweak to Eric Marsden's SLIM on a list that Helmut reads: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cmucl.devel/3850 (*): How sad is it that I apparently spent my 25th birthday hacking Emacs? :-)

9 20

[slime-devel] Slime hangs emacs in Initial handshake / complements
by Pascal J.Bourguignon 19 Jun '04

19 Jun '04

I forgot to write that C-g in emacs does not produce any effect, I have to kill it, and the processes are in these states: 10985 pts/1 R 12:09 \_ emacs 10986 ? S 0:00 \_ /usr/local/libexec/emacs/21.3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/emacsserve 11004 pts/4 S 0:11 \_ /local/languages/clisp//lib/clisp/full/lisp.run -B /local/ ........................................................................ Hello, I tried both with HEAD and FAIRLY_STABLE, when I run M-x slime RET, it loads clisp and the swap files (that it compiles along) and then: WARNING: These Swank interfaces are unimplemented: (ADD-FD-HANDLER ADD-SIGIO-HANDLER ALL-THREADS DISASSEMBLE-FRAME GETPID INTERRUPT-THREAD RECEIVE REMOVE-FD-HANDLERS REMOVE-SIGIO-HANDLERS SEND SPAWN WHO-MACROEXPANDS WHO-SPECIALIZES) ;; Loaded file /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/slime/swank-loader.lisp T [2]> ;; Swank started at port: 33514 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -1:** *inferior-lisp* Sat Jun 19 20:59 0.55 (Inferior Lisp:run Inf-Slime[polling ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Initial handshake... (show (version)) ;; --> "GNU Emacs 21.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2003-10-27 on thalassa" (show inferior-lisp-program) ;; --> "/usr/local/bin/clisp -ansi -q -K full -m 32M -I -E ISO-8859-1" GNU CLISP 2.33 (2004-03-17) (built 3289566600) (memory 3289567213) Software: GNU C 3.3 20030226 (prerelease) (SuSE Linux) ANSI C program Features: (CLOS LOOP COMPILER CLISP ANSI-CL COMMON-LISP LISP=CL INTERPRETER SOCKETS GENERIC-STREAMS LOGICAL-PATHNAMES SCREEN FFI GETTEXT UNICODE BASE-CHAR=CHARACTER PC386 UNIX) Installation directory: /local/languages/clisp/lib/clisp/ User language: ENGLISH Machine: I686 (I686) thalassa.informatimago.com [62.93.174.79] -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein

4 5

[slime-devel] Slime hangs emacs in Initial handshake.
by Pascal J.Bourguignon 19 Jun '04

19 Jun '04

Hello, I tried both with HEAD and FAIRLY_STABLE, when I run M-x slime RET, it loads clisp and the swap files (that it compiles along) and then: WARNING: These Swank interfaces are unimplemented: (ADD-FD-HANDLER ADD-SIGIO-HANDLER ALL-THREADS DISASSEMBLE-FRAME GETPID INTERRUPT-THREAD RECEIVE REMOVE-FD-HANDLERS REMOVE-SIGIO-HANDLERS SEND SPAWN WHO-MACROEXPANDS WHO-SPECIALIZES) ;; Loaded file /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/slime/swank-loader.lisp T [2]> ;; Swank started at port: 33514 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -1:** *inferior-lisp* Sat Jun 19 20:59 0.55 (Inferior Lisp:run Inf-Slime[polling ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Initial handshake... (show (version)) ;; --> "GNU Emacs 21.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2003-10-27 on thalassa" (show inferior-lisp-program) ;; --> "/usr/local/bin/clisp -ansi -q -K full -m 32M -I -E ISO-8859-1" GNU CLISP 2.33 (2004-03-17) (built 3289566600) (memory 3289567213) Software: GNU C 3.3 20030226 (prerelease) (SuSE Linux) ANSI C program Features: (CLOS LOOP COMPILER CLISP ANSI-CL COMMON-LISP LISP=CL INTERPRETER SOCKETS GENERIC-STREAMS LOGICAL-PATHNAMES SCREEN FFI GETTEXT UNICODE BASE-CHAR=CHARACTER PC386 UNIX) Installation directory: /local/languages/clisp/lib/clisp/ User language: ENGLISH Machine: I686 (I686) thalassa.informatimago.com [62.93.174.79] -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein

1 0

[slime-devel] CVS down?
by Pascal J.Bourguignon 19 Jun '04

19 Jun '04

% export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@common-lisp.net:/project/slime/cvsroot $ cvs login Logging in to :pserver:anonymous@common-lisp.net:2401/project/slime/cvsroot CVS password: anonymous % cvs checkout slime cvs [checkout aborted]: connect to common-lisp.net(69.55.225.117):2401 failed: Connection refused $ ping common-lisp.net PING common-lisp.net (69.55.225.117) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from common-lisp.net (69.55.225.117): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=243 ms 64 bytes from common-lisp.net (69.55.225.117): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=241 ms 64 bytes from common-lisp.net (69.55.225.117): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=241 ms 64 bytes from common-lisp.net (69.55.225.117): icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=242 ms Is this normal? Did I do something wrong? -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein

1 1

[slime-devel] slime-with-output-to-temp-buffer small fix
by Rui Patrocínio 19 Jun '04

19 Jun '04

Hello, When invoking something in a temp buffer, the old window configuration is erased by the current one. I don't know if this is a bug but it's a little annoying, so here is a small fix. Rui Patrocínio

1 0

[slime-devel] Daily ChangeLog diff
by Luke Gorrie 19 Jun '04

19 Jun '04

Index: slime/ChangeLog diff -u slime/ChangeLog:1.401 slime/ChangeLog:1.409 --- slime/ChangeLog:1.401 Thu Jun 17 10:42:39 2004 +++ slime/ChangeLog Fri Jun 18 14:54:34 2004 @@ -1,3 +1,38 @@ +2004-06-18 Luke Gorrie <luke(a)bluetail.com> + + * slime.el (slime-buffer-package): If DONT-CACHE is true and no + package name can be found, then default to "COMMON-LISP-USER." + Previously we just kept using the cached version, but that could + lead to error-after-error if it was incorrect. + + * swank.lisp (throw-to-toplevel): If our top-level catcher isn't + on the stack (i.e. we're using the debugger from outside an RPC) + then ABORT instead. That makes 'q' DWIM in SLDB. + +2004-06-18 Matthew Danish <mdanish(a)andrew.cmu.edu> + + * swank-allegro.lisp (frame-source-location-for-emacs): + Implemented. + +2004-06-18 Luke Gorrie <luke(a)bluetail.com> + + * slime.el (slime-repl-return): If the user presses return on old + REPL input then take it and insert it as the current input. + Signal an error if the point is not on any input. + (slime-preserve-zmacs-region): Function to ensure that the current + command doesn't deactivate zmacs-region (XEmacs only). + (slime-repl-bol, slime-repl-eol): Use it. + (slime-kill-all-buffers): Changed buffer-name regexps for XEmacs + compatibility. The ",quit" shortcut now works in XEmacs. + (slime-display-message): Fixed call to `slime-typeout-message' + to handle formatting characters. Avoids errors on certain messages. + (slime-list-compiler-notes): Save the window configuration + earlier. This fixes an error under XEmacs when dismissing the + notes buffer. + (slime-recenter-window): Avoid moving the point. This keeps the + point in the right place when showing debugger-frame locations in + Emacs 21. + 2004-06-17 Luke Gorrie <luke(a)bluetail.com> * swank-loader.lisp (binary-pathname): Place fasl files under

1 0

[slime-devel] Would like to add 'changed definitions' functionality
by Glenn Ehrlich 18 Jun '04

18 Jun '04

Hi, I'd like to add some sort of 'changed definitions' functionality to slime, i.e., be able to to evaluate or compile changed defs in the buffer or all buffers. I'm thinking of modeling this after the changed definitions of Genera (from my new lisp machine :) or LispWorks. I've looked at the similar functionality in ilisp (but you have to manually mark functions) and Franz's eli (which looks like it might be a good starting point). Any particular hints or comments folks would like to make before I start? Any internal functions that might be helpful? -- Glenn Ehrlich http://cooking-with-lisp.blogspot.com

3 4

Re: [slime-devel] SLIME User Survey
by Bill_Clementson＠peoplesoft.com 18 Jun '04

18 Jun '04

> Questions: > > Which Lisp versions do you use SLIME with? Allegro 6.2 and 7.0beta, LispWorks 4.3, CLISP 2.33, and ABCL (cvs) - all on Win2000 > Which Emacs versions? GNU Emacs 21.3.50 > How well does SLIME work for you? Great! I used ILISP and ELI in the past, but SLIME seems to have the best mix of features, stability and portability. I only use SLIME today. > What bugs (reproducible or otherwise) or missing features annoy you? bug: the "v"iew source option in sldb doesn't work for any implementation I'm using feature: it would be *really* nice to have edebug-like debugging in SLIME > Is there some packaging system (e.g. Debian) that you would like to > see SLIME 1.0 bundled with? If so, do you know how to coordinate this? Windows installer - just joking ;-) Debian seems the obvious choice (although I don't use Linux). Kevin Rosenberg has done a fantastic job looking after a lot of the CL packages on Debian (have a look at http://b9.com/debian.html to see a list of the ones he maintains). You might try twisting his arm a little to get him to look after SLIME too :-) > If you said anything negative above then please say something nice > here to make us feel good: SLIME just seems to go from strength to strength - great job you guys! - Bill

1 0