I'm a long-time Emacs user, but I'm just starting to learn Common
Lisp. SLIME looks great, but I'm having a problem during installation.
I have the following system:
Windows 2000 SP4
CLisp version 2.30
GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195)
I installed SLIME version 1.0 as per the manual and added the following to
my .emacs file:
------------------------------------------------------
;;; SLIME Configuration
(setq inferior-lisp-program "c:/devtools/clisp/lisp.exe -M
c:/devtools/clisp/lispinit.mem -B c:/devtools/clisp/")
(add-to-list 'load-path "d:/pub/site-lisp/slime")
(require 'slime)
(slime-setup)
------------------------------------------------------
But when I 'M-x slime', I get the following in the *inferior-lisp* buffer:
======================================================
[1]>
;; Loading file D:\Pub\site-lisp\slime\swank-loader.lisp ...
;; Compiling D:\Pub\site-lisp\slime\swank-backend.lisp...
Compiling file D:\Pub\site-lisp\slime\swank-backend.lisp ...
WARNING in DEFINTERFACE-GEN-DEFAULT-IMPL in lines 43..64 :
variable RECEIVED-ARGS is not used.
Misspelled or missing IGNORE declaration?
WARNING in (DEFINTERFACE EMACS-CONNECTED (STREAM) ...)-19-3-1-1 in lines
134..144 :
variable STREAM is not used.
Misspelled or missing IGNORE declaration?
WARNING in (DEFINTERFACE MAKE-STREAM-INTERACTIVE (STREAM) ...)-37-3-1-1 in
lines 268..274 :
variable STREAM is not used.
Misspelled or missing IGNORE declaration?
WARNING in (DEFINTERFACE CONDITION-REFERENCES (CONDITION) ...)-55-3-1-1 in
lines 413..420 :
variable CONDITION is not used.
Misspelled or missing IGNORE declaration?
*** - DEFSTRUCT: invalid syntax for name and options:
(:LOCATION (:TYPE LIST) :NAMED
(:CONSTRUCTOR MAKE-LOCATION (BUFFER POSITION &OPTIONAL HINTS)))
1. Break SWANK-BACKEND[2]>
======================================================
And I get the following message on the message line over and over:
"Polling "c:/Temp/slime.1252".. (Abort with `M-x slime-abort-connection'.)"
I went back a few months in the slime-devel archives, but I didn't see
anything describing this problem.
Thank you,
Tad Ashlock