September 2007 - slime-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[slime-devel] asdf:load'ing swank
by Cyrus Harmon 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

If I start with a clean slime directory (no fasls) and attempt to (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :swank), I get an error message as the swank package isn't loaded when it tries to access some things in the swank::... package. The following patch fixes thing, although there might be a better approach. Cyrus

3 5

[slime-devel] find-definition with Allegro 8 on Windows
by Tom Weissmann 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

Hello, I'm using Slime with Allegro 8 on Windows. Is it possible to use Allegro's find definition and have the relevant file open in Emacs? Thanks in advance, Tom Weissmann

2 3

[slime-devel] Can you afford to lose 300, 000 potential customers per year ?
by Instant＠common-lisp.net 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

1 0

[slime-devel] slime-fancy and slime-editing-commands
by Raymond Toy 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

I notice that slime-fancy loads slime-editing-commands. AFAIK, you need to add slime-bind-editing-commands to slime-mode-hook. But slime-fancy doesn't do that. Should it? Just wondering. Ray

2 1

[slime-devel] Post your ads where people read them!!!
by Feed＠common-lisp.net 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

1 0

[slime-devel] Daily ChangeLog diff
by mbaringer＠common-lisp.net 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

Index: slime/ChangeLog diff -u slime/ChangeLog:1.1213 slime/ChangeLog:1.1214 --- slime/ChangeLog:1.1213 Mon Sep 10 17:45:17 2007 +++ slime/ChangeLog Tue Sep 11 15:31:45 2007 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +2007-09-11 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> + + * swank-loader.lisp: Aways compile-file `contrib/swank-asdf.lisp' + on SBCL. This fixes "Undefined function" style-warnings when using + `slime-asdf' in combination with SBCL. Reported by Cyrus Harmon. + + * swank-sbcl.lisp: Explicitly require ASDF. (While this is not + strictly necessary, as it's implicitly loaded on requiring the + other modules, I think it's better to be explicit about it.) + 2007-09-10 Helmut Eller <heller(a)common-lisp.net> Fix some bugs introduced while moving doc refs to contrib. Index: slime/contrib/ChangeLog diff -u slime/contrib/ChangeLog:1.43 slime/contrib/ChangeLog:1.47 --- slime/contrib/ChangeLog:1.43 Mon Sep 10 17:44:48 2007 +++ slime/contrib/ChangeLog Tue Sep 11 13:11:08 2007 @@ -1,3 +1,30 @@ +2007-09-11 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> + + * slime-editing-commands.el: Automatically bind the editing + commands when this module is required. (Previously, one had to + enable them explicitly, but this is inconsistent to, for instance, + the `slime-c-p-c' module which also sets up its bindings + automatically.) + (slime-bind-editing-commands): Renamed to `slime-editing-commands-init'. + (slime-editing-commands-init): Evaluated at toplevel. + +2007-09-11 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> + + * slime-parse.el (slime-enclosing-form-specs): Now also works even + when point is inside a string. + (slime-inside-string-p): New function. + (slime-beginning-of-string): New function. + +2007-09-11 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> + + * swank-arglist.lisp (read-conversatively-for-autodoc): Also parse + quoted symbols explicitly. This fixed extended arglist display for + `(make-instance 'foo'. Reported by: Johannes Groedem. + +2007-09-11 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> + + * slime-fancy.el: Require `slime-references'. + 2007-09-10 Helmut Eller <heller(a)common-lisp.net> * slime-parse.el (slime-cl-symbol-name, slime-cl-symbol-package): @@ -37,7 +64,7 @@ window-configuration, and explicitly set the hook. (slime-fuzzy-done): Explicitely remove the hook. -2007-09-10 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> +2007-09-10 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> * slime-parse.el (slime-cl-symbol-name, slime-cl-symbol-package): Moved back into slime.el. @@ -53,7 +80,7 @@ ecase, for dispatching targets. Should fix XEmacs compatibility. Reported by Steven E. Harris. -2007-09-05 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> +2007-09-05 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> * swank-c-p-c.el: This file incorrectly provided the module `:swank-compound-prefix'; changed that to `:swank-c-p-c'. @@ -65,12 +92,12 @@ `*arglist-pprint-bindings*' to be special, as the variable is defined later in the file. (Gets rid of warnings during loading.) -2007-09-05 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> +2007-09-05 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> * slime-c-p-c.el (slime-c-p-c-init): Bind `slime-complete-form' to `C-c C-s' in `slime-repl-mode-map'. -2007-09-05 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> +2007-09-05 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> Added extended arglist display for DECLAIM and PROCLAIM.

1 0

[slime-devel] "How would you like to have your ad on 2 Million Websites ?"
by BlogBlaster＠common-lisp.net 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

1 0

[slime-devel] test
by Jeff Cunningham 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

Testing to see if my access has been turned off. -Jeff

1 0

[slime-devel] M-. errs on SBCL functions
by Stelian Ionescu 11 Sep '07

11 Sep '07

With latest slime, when doing M-.(slime-edit-definition) on SBCL functions like SB-SYS:SERVE-EVENT I get this error message: slime-goto-location-position: Invalid function: save-restriction-if-possible this is because the macro `save-restriction-if-possible' is defined after `slime-goto-location-position' and, when byte-compiling slime.el, it breaks. I've attached a patch that moves `save-restriction-if-possible' right before `slime-goto-location-position' -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

3 3

[slime-devel] slime-setup vs slime-ensure-typeout-frame
by Raymond Toy 11 Sep '07

11 Sep '07

After many months, I finally decided to update my copy of slime from the last version I had (Apr 2007) [1]. I see that things have changed quite a bit, and it seems slime-setup is the appropriate way to set up slime. However if you do (slime-setup :typeout-frame t), you get an error that slime-ensure-typeout-frame doesn't exist. Should slime-setup take care to load contrib/slime-typeout-frame.el is loaded? Or is that the user's responsibility? If the former, then consider this a bug report. :-) Ray [1] Slime did everything I wanted and never seemed to have any bugs that affected me, so I didn't see any reason to upgrade.

2 2