slime-devel July 2008

slime-devel@common-lisp.net

20 participants
38 discussions

[slime-devel] stepping
by Roman Budzianowski 05 Jul '08

05 Jul '08

Hi, Somehow, it doesn't work in my allegro, using SLIME PQ> (defun fact (n) (if (= n 1) 1 (* n (fact (1- n))))) FACT PQ> (fact 3) 6 PQ> (compile 'fact) FACT NIL NIL PQ> :step nil NIL PQ> (step fact) (FACT) PQ> (fact 3) 6 PQ> I'd appreciate any suggestions. Roman

3 3

[slime-devel] SLIME under Ubuntu 7.04 feisty
by Stever 05 Jul '08

05 Jul '08

Hello, Has anyone used SLIME with ubuntu 7.04 feisty? I am having trouble doing it. I checked all over the web and couldn't find much. I am resorting to asking someone on the maillist. If I find the answer, I'll post it up on my blog for other's benefit. Anyway, I installed lisp via conventional means: sudo apt-get install clisp sudo apt-get install slime When I go into emacs and type "alt-x slime", I get the following error: [1]> *** - LOAD: A file with name /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/slime/swank-loader.lisp does not exist The following restarts are available: ABORT :R1 ABORT I have looked all over the internet and couldn't find the solution to this problem. I tried another 7.04 machine and had the same problem. I also tried altering my .emacs file as follows: (setq inferior-lisp-program "/usr/bin/clisp") (add-to-list 'load-path "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/slime") (require 'slime) (slime-setup) Still the same problem. Anyone know the answer? - Steve

3 4

[slime-devel] slime-read-interactive-args
by Harald Hanche-Olsen 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

Quoth the docstring of slime-read-interactive-args: - If the prefix-arg is `-', prompt for one of the registered lisps. There is just one small problem with this: There is no way (that I know of) to get a prefix arg on an emacs running under a tty. How about changing the condition to include any negative argument? This bites me just often enough to be annoying. - Harald

3 4

[slime-devel] Patch: Source location of methods (Allegro)
by Willem Broekema 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

The below patch works around the issue that Allegro does not record the source file location for methods defined inside a defgeneric form. The idea is that if the source location of a method is not found, then the defgeneric form is almost certainly the right place. For example: (defgeneric foo (x) (:method ((x fixnum)) (/ 1 0))) Calling (foo 123) and hitting "v" in the traceback would result in "Unknown source location for (method common-lisp-user::foo)" but with the patch leads correctly to the defgeneric form. (For methods defined outside the defgeneric form, the source location recording works fine.) *** swank-allegro.lisp 10 Jun 2008 19:55:30 +0200 1.102 --- swank-allegro.lisp 10 Jun 2008 21:19:20 +0200 *************** *** 414,419 **** --- 414,426 ---- (fspec-definition-locations next))) (t (let ((defs (excl::find-source-file fspec))) + (when (and (null defs) + (listp fspec) + (string= (car fspec) '#:method)) + ;; If methods are defined in a defgeneric form, the source location is + ;; recorded for the gf but not for the methods. Therefore fall back to + ;; the gf as the likely place of definition. + (setq defs (excl::find-source-file (second fspec)))) (if (null defs) (list (list (list nil fspec)

2 1

[slime-devel] PATCH: slime-qualify-cl-symbol-name
by kroger.lists＠gmail.com 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

Hi, If the user uses slime-call-defun in a file without a package defined the function in the repl will have a nil package like (nil::foo ). The attached patch fixes it. (I know that it's not a good style to develop without packages, but I teach using slime and it's good not to use packages in the beginning) Cheers, Pedro

2 1

[slime-devel] *trace-output*
by Aaron Feng 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

I'm trying to output my trace results to the slime repl in emacs. I assume I have to set *trace-output* to the slime output window, but I don't know accomplish this. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Aaron

2 1

[slime-devel] Incompatible change in SBCL 1.0.18.10
by Richard M Kreuter 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

Hi, SBCL 1.0.18.10 makes a change to a structure in a way that affects SLIME. The attached patch to today's anonymous CVS seems to work for both the new SBCL and older ones. Please let me know if it's not up to snuff for merging. -- RmK

2 1

[slime-devel] Daily ChangeLog diff
by mbaringer＠common-lisp.net 03 Jul '08

03 Jul '08

Index: slime/ChangeLog diff -u slime/ChangeLog:1.1359 slime/ChangeLog:1.1360 --- slime/ChangeLog:1.1359 Sat Jun 7 07:50:24 2008 +++ slime/ChangeLog Wed Jul 2 06:02:14 2008 @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2008-07-02 Martin Simmons <martin(a)lispworks.com> + * swank-lispworks.lisp (install-debugger-globally): hook into the + environment globally to catch BREAK. + 2008-06-07 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr(a)freebits.de> * slime.el (def-slime-test find-definition.2, arglist):

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

slime-devel July 2008