March 2016 - slime-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

Can't locate module: SWANK-IO-PACKAGE::SWANK-MACROSTEP
by David Hodge 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

Hi there, I recently upgraded slime via melpa and restarting emacs produced this message: " Can't locate module: SWANK-IO-PACKAGE::SWANK-MACROSTEP" and puts me into the common lisp debugger. Quitting the debugger aborts the slime start up. I can see the swank macrostep source in the distribution ( but it has not been compiled yet I think) so I am hoping someone more knowledgable might be able to advise me how to debug this? Best Regards

2 1

Removing SLIME's ChangeLog files
by Luís Oliveira 24 Mar '16

24 Mar '16

Hello, I'm considering removing SLIME's ChangeLog files. If you have an opinion about that, please make yourself heard over at https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/308. Cheers, -- Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/

2 2

Re: SLIME 2.17 and macrostep on MELPA stable: needs 0.9, only 0.8 available?
by Stas Boukarev 03 Mar '16

03 Mar '16

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Georges Ko <gko(a)gko.net> wrote: >> Slime ships macrostep.el, so, how come MELPA doesn't like it? (I don't > use MELPA). > > In slime.el, there is: > > ;; Package-Requires: ((cl-lib "0.5") (macrostep "0.9")) So then it becomes a bit silly, no point in bundling a package if it can't be used. I would say MELPA should just have the latest macrostep. -- With best regards, Stas.

2 1

SLIME 2.17 and macrostep on MELPA stable: needs 0.9, only 0.8 available?
by Georges Ko 03 Mar '16

03 Mar '16

Hello, When trying to install SLIME 2.17 on MELPA stable, it needs macrostep-0.9, but only 0.8 is available. Can this explicit dependency be removed in SLIME, as macrostep.el is already in lib? Or make 0.9 available on MELPA stable? Georges -- Georges KO (gko(a)gko.net)

2 2