- slime-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[slime-devel] Bug in SLIME 1.0 from CVS?
by Denis Bueno 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

Sorry if you get this twice, the first wasn't from my list-subscribed email. When SLIME starts up, it says: ; SLIME 2004-09-08 I was visiting a lisp (.cl) buffer and looking at this function: (defun first-function (tokens) (let ((pos (position "[" tokens :test #'string=))) (if (> pos 0) (nth (1- pos) tokens) (error "invalid function call: empty function")))) I put the Emacs cursor after the last right-paren, issued C-c C-c, and the SLIME debugger popped up; it said (I've expanded the top stack frame): ********************** invalid number of arguments: 3 [Condition of type SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR] Restarts: 0: [ABORT] Abort handling SLIME request. 1: [ABORT] Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger, returning to toplevel). 2: [TOPLEVEL] Restart at toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop. Backtrace: 0: ("XEP for SWANK::COMPILE-STRING-FOR-EMACS" 3 "(defun first-function (tokens) (let ((pos (position \"[\" tokens :test #'string=))) (if (> pos 0) (nth (1- pos) tokens) (error \"invalid function call: empty function\")))) " "function-parser.cl" 1266 1)[:EXTERNAL] Locals: SB-DEBUG::ARG-0 = 3 SB-DEBUG::ARG-1 = "(defun first-function (tokens) (let ((pos (position \"[\" tokens :test #'string=))) (if (> pos 0) (nth (1- pos) tokens) (error \"invalid function call: empty function\")))) " SB-DEBUG::ARG-2 = "function-parser.cl" SB-DEBUG::ARG-3 = 1266 SB-DEBUG::ARG-4 = 1 [No catch-tags] *********************** Apparently COMPILE-STRING-FOR-EMACS is being called incorrectly ... but I looked in swank.lisp, swank-backend.lisp, slime.el, and swank-sbcl.lisp, and all calls to COMPILE-STRING-FOR-EMACS has four arguments. So I'm befuddled. I use SBCL. Am I doing something improperly? -- Denis Bueno PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xA1B51B4B&op=index My other car is a cdr.

3 3

[slime-devel] Error in function CREATE-INET-LISTENER (OS X + CMUCL)
by Matthew Munz 11 Sep '04

11 Sep '04

Hi all, I'm just getting started with SLIME and CMUCL, so any help would be really appreciated. I set up SLIME 1.0 on a linux machine according to the manual's instructions, and M-x slime worked out-of-the-box quite nicely. The analogous setup on OS X, however, gives me the following error. After this point, the inferior lisp mode works fine, but slime mode does not. A problem with the socket communication perhaps? Could someone please help me debug this? I think that my network interface is properly configured, but since it's my day 1 with SLIME, it's hard for me to know how to analyze this error. * ;; Swank started at port: 49188. 49188 * Error in function CREATE-INET-LISTENER: Error binding socket to port 0: Can't assign requested address [Condition of type SIMPLE-ERROR] Restarts: 0: [ABORT] Return to Top-Level. Debug (type H for help) (CREATE-INET-LISTENER 0 :STREAM :HOST 2130706433 ...) Source: Error finding source: Error in function DEBUG::GET-FILE-TOP-LEVEL-FORM: Source file no longer exists: target:code/internet.lisp. Matthew M. Munz mattmunz(a)email.com -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

3 2

[slime-devel] Cannot compile slime for sbcl on debian ppc
by Sam Zoghaib 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Hello, I am trying to compile slime for sbcl 0.8.14 running on a Debian PowerPC computer. The compilation fails as follows: ; compiling file "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/slime/swank-sbcl.lisp (written 04 SEP 2004 08:38:20) debugger invoked on a SB-INT:EXTENSION-FAILURE in thread 2952: Don't know how to REQUIRE SB-BSD-SOCKETS. See also: The SBCL Manual, Variable SB-EXT:*MODULE-PROVIDER-FUNCTIONS* The SBCL Manual, Function REQUIRE It fails with the CVS version as well as with 1.0. Is there anything I am missing ? Thanks, Sam -- All ITS machines now have hardware for a new machine instruction -- RIG Read Interrecord Gap. Please update your programs.

2 1

[slime-devel] Daily ChangeLog diff
by Luke Gorrie 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Index: slime/ChangeLog diff -u slime/ChangeLog:1.515 slime/ChangeLog:1.516 --- slime/ChangeLog:1.515 Wed Sep 8 18:16:42 2004 +++ slime/ChangeLog Thu Sep 9 17:57:58 2004 @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2004-09-09 Martin Simmons <martin(a)xanalys.com> + + * swank-loader.lisp (make-swank-pathname): Preserve the host + component (important for LispWorks on Windows). + 2004-09-08 Martin Simmons <martin(a)xanalys.com> * swank-lispworks.lisp: Implement call-with-compilation-hooks.

1 0

[slime-devel] Lispworks patches.
by Eduardo Muñoz 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

A couple of patches that I found necessary using Lispworks Personal Edition. These should be considered more a proof of concept than polished code. The first one enables the load-library repl-shorcut by just defining a dummy call-with-compilation-hooks. The second does a better work finding files, IMHO, given that the phisical drive of a file (on windows) is stored as the host component and it is not used to construct the pathname. Of course a pathname expert should review the thing before commit. $ diff -u swank-lispworks.lisp~ swank-lispworks.lisp --- swank-lispworks.lisp~ 2004-09-07 00:13:30.000000000 +0200 +++ swank-lispworks.lisp 2004-09-05 18:09:44.000000000 +0200 @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ (loop for (dspec location) in locations collect (list dspec (make-dspec-location dspec location))))) + ;;; Compilation (defmacro with-swank-compilation-unit ((location &rest options) &body body) @@ -327,6 +328,10 @@ (with-swank-compilation-unit (filename) (compile-file filename :load load-p))) +(defimplementation call-with-compilation-hooks (function) + ;; #'pray instead of #'handler-bind + (funcall function)) + (defun map-error-database (database fn) (loop for (filename . defs) in database do (loop for (dspec . conditions) in defs do ======================================================================= $ diff -u swank-loader.lisp~ swank-loader.lisp --- swank-loader.lisp~ 2004-09-04 18:19:52.000000000 +0200 +++ swank-loader.lisp 2004-09-05 17:35:52.000000000 +0200 @@ -15,17 +15,10 @@ (defun make-swank-pathname (name &optional (type "lisp")) "Return a pathname with name component NAME in the Slime directory." - (merge-pathnames name - (make-pathname - :type type - :device - (pathname-device - (or *compile-file-pathname* *load-pathname* - *default-pathname-defaults*)) - :directory - (pathname-directory - (or *compile-file-pathname* *load-pathname* - *default-pathname-defaults*))))) + (merge-pathnames (make-pathname :name name :type type) + (or *compile-file-pathname* + *load-pathname* + *default-pathname-defaults*))) (defparameter *sysdep-pathnames* (mapcar #'make-swank-pathname -- Eduardo Muñoz | (prog () 10 (print "Hello world!") http://213.97.131.125/ | 20 (go 10))

2 3

[slime-devel] slime.texi nit - s/compliments/complements.
by John Paul Wallington 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Here's a typo in the manual: --- slime.texi 04 Sep 2004 23:08:09 +0100 1.28 +++ slime.texi 05 Sep 2004 00:40:42 +0100 @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ @SLIME{} extends Emacs with new support for interactive programming in Common Lisp. The features are centred around @code{slime-mode}, an Emacs -minor-mode that compliments the standard @code{lisp-mode}. While +minor-mode that complements the standard @code{lisp-mode}. While @code{lisp-mode} supports editing Lisp source files, @code{slime-mode} adds support for interacting with a running Common Lisp process for compilation, debugging, documentation lookup, and so on.

2 1

[slime-devel] SWANK-IO-PACAKGE being used amidst (slime-eval FORM ":cl")
by Sean Champ 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Hello, While trying to get slime to tell the repl to evaluate some common lisp code, I had tried to use the emacs form: (slime-eval '(format t "ping ~d" 12) ":cl-user") but, when I use this, sldb pops-up, with a message about: Error in KERNEL:%COERCE-TO-FUNCTION: the function SWANK-IO-PACKAGE::FORMAT is undefined. So, I am just wondering why the package named SWANK-IO-PACKAGE is being used, as the package in which the REPL will evaluate the slime-eval'd FORM - instead of slime-eval using the :cl-user package, which was mentioned, also, in the call to slime-eval. Thank you -- Sean

2 1

[slime-devel] xemacs asking me "Enter recursive edit?" when sldb comes up
by Sean Champ 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Hello again, I'm using the debianized slime 1.0, point-of-fact-ly. When sldb pops up, now, I am seeing XEmacs asking me (always, whenever sldb pops up) "Enter recursive edit?" in the minibuffer. When I say "yes" to that minibuffer-query, things go well. When I say "no" to that minibuffer-query, then things do not seem to go well - at least, not until after I C-g , then C-] to clear the resultant emacs error-message. So, I was wondering if there would be a way to tell {whatever is asking me whether to "Enter recursive edit?"} to always "yes" - that being, to always do so. Thank you -- Sean

2 2

[slime-devel] OS X: OpenMCL 0.14.2-p1 and Slime-1.0 Error
by Ian J Cottee 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

(found the solution to this but reporting it in case there's a better way to handle the situation in future versions of SLIME) I've been using Slime with CLISP on Windows (just as a learning environment) and love it so I thought I'd get an environment working with my iMac as well. I tried to get CLISP working but it threw me an error so I thought I'd try again and install OpenMCL instead. However, it also threw me an error (reproduced below) which I eventually tracked down to my ~/.slime directory causing me problems. Apparantly running slime originally with CLISP caused a problem. When I removed ~/.slime and started again everything worked fine. For the record (in case anybody else is googling like me), the error I got was as follows: Welcome to OpenMCL Version (Beta: Darwin) 0.14.2-p1! ? > Error in process listener(1): Incompatible lambda list in #<STANDARD-METHOD\ SWANK-COMPILE-STRING (T)> for #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION SWANK-COMPILE-STRING\ #x6381456> > While executing: CCL::CHECK-DEFMETHOD-CONGRUENCY > Type :GO to continue, :POP to abort. > If continued: Remove 0 methods from the generic-function and change its lambd\ a list. Type :? for other options. 1 > Hope this is of some use Ian Cottee

1 0

[slime-devel] Daily ChangeLog diff
by Luke Gorrie 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

Index: slime/ChangeLog diff -u slime/ChangeLog:1.514 slime/ChangeLog:1.515 --- slime/ChangeLog:1.514 Sat Sep 4 00:12:53 2004 +++ slime/ChangeLog Wed Sep 8 18:16:42 2004 @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-09-08 Martin Simmons <martin(a)xanalys.com> + + * swank-lispworks.lisp: Implement call-with-compilation-hooks. + 2004-09-03 Helmut Eller <e9626484(a)stud3.tuwien.ac.at> * NEWS: Summarize changes since August.

1 0