5 Mar
2007
5 Mar
'07
9 p.m.
+ Samium Gromoff _deepfire@feelingofgreen.ru:
| As it stands now, it appears that Swank does not signal its own existance via *features*. | | Is there another, more idiomatic way to check for RUNNING-UNDER-SWANK-iness, | or did i actually spot something missing?
Um, what's wrong with (find-package :swank) ?
If you need to, you can always roll your own (if (find-package :swank) (pushnew :swank *features*)) so that you can use #+swank or #-swank if that is what you need to do. But if so, it makes me wonder why you want this.
- Harald