9 Oct
2014
9 Oct
'14
9:33 a.m.
A bit off topic…
Didn't at a certain point “hierarchical packages” appear in several implementations? And wasn’t the dot #. the separator character used in those cases?
Cheers — MA
On Oct 9, 2014, at 24:16 , Helmut Eller eller.helmut@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08 2014, Luís Oliveira wrote:
Helmut, adding a swank-backend nickname to swank/backend would probably fix most of these. Would you be OK with adding such a nickname to ease the migration?
That's OK with me. Though, I consider the swank/FOO packages internal interfaces that are needed to implement SWANK but are not an API for third party code.
Helmut
Slime-devel mailing list Slime-devel@common-lisp.net http://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel
-- Marco Antoniotti