19 Apr
2005
19 Apr
'05
11:30 a.m.
Andreas Fuchs <asf@boinkor.net> writes:
I'm not entirely sure which of SBCL or SLIME needs to be fixed. Either SBCL should start including :sb-futex on its *feature* list again (or some other feature saying that threads are non-broken on this lisp build), or SLIME should stop checking for :sb-futex (which will break on SBCLs older than 0.8.21).
If it's possible given the time constraints and cvs tagging activity, I'd be happy if the preferred-communication-style checked only :sb-thread, and if the slime release notes for 1.2 required an sbcl of 0.8.21 or later. Would that be OK with you guys? Sorry for the eleventh-hour (or even later) change request... Cheers, Christophe