Jeffrey Cunningham jeffrey@cunningham.net writes:
Okay.
The current manual looks like it was generated with makeinfo. Where can I find the source for that?
doc/slime.texi
Is it necessarily desirable to continue using that documentation model? I just put togther documentation for a large set of codes at work using doxygen which, of course, has no Lisp support, but did open my eyes to the possibilities.
personally i believe the things like doxygen, while usefull, should only complement a hand written user manual. using something like sbcl's docstrings.lisp would be cool for the swank configuration variables, but i'd strongly suggest keeping the current model.