31 May
2006
31 May
'06
2:47 p.m.
On May 31, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
Gary King gwking@metabang.com writes:
Although it makes perfect sense, I find it irritating that the number for the [abort-request] restart in SLDB depends on how many other restarts are active. For clarity's sake, here is a list of restarts:
Isn't q bound to ABORT-REQUEST for just this reason?
It may not be immediately obvious from the documentation that it is equivalent, but it indeed is. Maybe just the documentation needs to be improved?
Wow, that is handy. If it is in the documentation then I missed it too.
Michael